May 19th, 2010 | Tags: , ,

It will come as no surprise to you, if I share a long standing opinion I have regarding the leading business e-mail system (if the leading logo didn’t give it away already). You guessed it, Microsoft Exchange!

During my career in IT I have heard of, participated in or influenced many migrations from alternate solutions, the most common being IBM’s Lotus Notes. However the next wave of cloud based competitors are trying to penetrate this emerging and highly lucrative market, Google being a major contender in this space. 

Back in June 2009 Google bleeted about how Serena Software made the switch from Exchange to Google Apps, and upon completion of this then successful migration Serena’s Director of IT, Ron Brister was happy to share: 

We made the switch globally, all in one day – and, due to the advantages of this cloud computing solution, we’ve never looked back.

However less than a year on, it seems that this success was short lived. Serena are now a happy Microsoft customers once again, with a subsequent migration to Exchange, SharePoint and Office Online.

As a result of Serena’s experience with Google, Brister stated:

There are alternatives on the market that promise lower costs, but in our experience, this is a fallacy.  When looking at alternatives, CIOs should really evaluate the total cost of ownership as well as the impact on user productivity and satisfaction, as there can be hidden costs and higher TCO.  For instance, slow performance and/or lack of enterprise-class features (e.g., with calendaring and contact management) will torpedo the value of such a backbone system, and may get the CIO fired.

Ron, I couldn’t agree with you more. P.S. I respect you for having the balls to make these steps in the first place! 🙂

May 14th, 2010 | Tags:

Office Communicator recognises “tel:” hyperlinks, these can be embedded within websites i.e. SharePoint or even your Outlook signature and you don’t need to be an HTML wizz to make it work.

The following HTML needs to be inserted inside of your page’s body tags i.e. <body></body>

<a href=”tel:618″>618</a>

The code above will initiate a MOC call to “618”, this happens to be my internal office extension number (618 is entered twice, the first instance is the number and the second is the label). Once clicked, the following security message needs to be allowed.

Once accepted, you can click “space bar” to initiate the call. Be aware that sending the links outside of your organisation will require a Communicator deployment with voice integration and the embedding of e.164 formatted numbers to route the call over the PSTN.

May 11th, 2010 | Tags: , ,

As with most Office 2010 beta testers, I was very keen (upon release to web for software assurance customers) to start using the 2010 suite at work. As a result I noticed functionality that I had previously not identified.

One example is within the Outlook 2010 contact card and the capability to playback a contact’s name. Where enterprises have Exchange unified messaging deployed (2007 & 2010), Exchange accesses your pre-existing voicemail contact name customisation for audio based name playback. Nice touch!

April 23rd, 2010 | Tags:

Details below…

Product Update Downloads/KBs
Office Communications Server 2007 R2, Group Chat Server GCS_2007R2_CU5 980042
Office Communications Server 2007 R2, Group Chat Client GCC_2007R2_CU5 980043
Office Communications Server 2007 R2, Group Chat Admin Tool GCA_2007R2_CU5 982128
Office Communications Server 2007 R2, Group Chat Server SDK GCSDK_2007R2_CU5 981449
April 21st, 2010 | Tags:

Today I attended an Avaya Unified Communications “Special Interest Group” or (SIG), this briefing is aimed at targeting specific topics for the more strategic, focussed and tech savvy audience.

It was held at the ex-Nortel UK headquarters in Maidenhead, whilst most buildings were still branded Nortel, I was guided to the only Avaya signposted building on the lot.

The agenda was to broken in two main topics:

  • A look at Avaya’s Aura product set, specifically Aura System Platform, Aura Session Manager and AvayaACE.
  • The “New Avaya”, another look at the combined Nortel/Avaya portfolio – four months since the acquisition.

There were some other ancillary discussions around the Bay Networks portfolio and consulting services, but I have chosen to not cover this – sorry!

I will however focus on the main topics and start off by saying “let the games begin”, it became obvious very early into the sessions that the Nortel/Microsoft romance is dead! Examples of this will be disclosed further into the post.

First the Avaya Aura Product set

Our first speaker explained the “coming together of red and blue” meaning the partnership of Avaya and Nortel, he mentioned this as the majority of the speakers were of Nortel origin i.e. blue.

The session was an introduction to Avaya’s Aura portfolio and their roadmap independent of Nortel ties, the “Aura” communications suite is the latest of their innovations. The base system or PBX is an SME solution, pitched at up to 2,500 users, it comprises of a 2U rack mountable IBM server. This server runs a Hypervisor (Aura System Platform) capable of Virtualizing all your licensed modules, it has two built-in E1 ports and can be expanded with an additional gateway device. Their medium-large enterprise solution is not as compact as the SME product and does not utilise the Aura System Platform (the MLE solution was not discussed in detail).

The Aura Session Manager permits multi-vendor SIP based integration into the Avaya Aura stack, an example for Session Manager was the capability of branch office ISDN rationalisation via WAN SIP integration – I liked this, especially as it was completely vendor agnostic. The second example was the capability of routing numbers based on tariff via the most appropriate PSTN breakout i.e. ISDN in City of London or a SIP trunk in New York all held together with Session Manager in the middle.

There were various examples of other integrations, Lotus (yes Exchange was not mentioned, and the presenter made reference to his Microsoft hatred!) Google Apps, Google Buzz, Skype, Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook. He closed by stating that “Communicator was so last year”, then proceeded to show Web.alive a concept idea (basically a poor corporate clone of SecondLife). At this point I felt Avaya was made up of a bunch of geeks sitting around and inventing cool communications stuff with little or no understanding of end-user accessibility!

A new speaker, perhaps with less Micro-hate, presented AvayaACE, as an SOA like communications layer used to integrate different end-user applications and back-end systems. An example used was the enablement of a supported Communications Server “14”with remote call setup. I was very quick to advise the speaker that Microsoft has already announced support for “14” for existing deployments, he then corrected himself – I’m not picking sides here? It was also said that ACE could provide an open CTI interface allowing an easy migration from PBX vendor A to B, ACE is not just pitched at Avaya/Nortel estates.

For those not running Communications Server he displayed the ACE out-of-the-box experience for Outlook integration and click-to-call. The Outlook plug-in was okay, but not a patch on Communicator, the click-to-call was good, also with a web browser plug-in – this I liked and not available in Communicator releases to date.

There is also a hot desk web portal used for call forwarding control, this was nice, but I couldn’t help thinking that Communicator was far easier to use. Next a slide was shown where a BlackBerry had an ACE client for call optimisation, the scenario here is setting up a call from the cheapest origin. On the surface this is the same as Research in Motion’s Mobile Voice Service (MVS). In ACE’s case, mobile clients are planned for iPhone and Windows Phone, definitely more open than MVS!

The “New Avaya”

Not much has changed from a lifecycle perspective, 9 months notice on end of sale – and this is yet to be unannounced and from what it seems possibly extended beyond recent rumours on the web. I suspect this due to the fact that whilst senior Avaya execs want to chop its portfolio ASAP, they just can’t, for fear that they will alienate a load of customers! Given that Avaya is committed to release 7.0 for CS1000 and another release being pitched the earliest window for end of sale might be 2012?

  • R6 for CS1000 – will support Aura end-points
  • R7 for CS1000 – enhanced Aura integration for better migration path

I was impressed with the way customers are being supported/guided in this area, there are a ton of new offers available from Avaya and an emphasis on 3 year plans was being recommended, always good to see these fiscal sensitivities during tough economic times!

April 17th, 2010 | Tags:

The Microsoft Office Blog has just announced that Office 2010, SharePoint 2010, Visio 2010 & Project 2010 have all RTM’ed! This is great news and fits in nicely with our company Windows 7 roll-out strategy. Unlike previous upgrades i.e. 2003 -> 2007 there are fewer compatibility issues to worry about, therefore the idea is to bundle this into our ConfigMgr task sequence along-side our existing test cycles.

Enterprise customers (software assurance) will be able to get their mits on the bits April 27th via the Volume Licensing Service Centre, other customers can purchase the products after May 1st.

Update: Now available for download on TechNet and MSDN.

For the full announcement, head here